Skip to Content
Main content

EDWARDS-KNOX CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

90

42%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

78

34%

LEVEL 2

98

43%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

41

42%

LEVEL 2

37

38%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

37

36%

LEVEL 2

45

43%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

43

36%

LEVEL 2

53

45%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

41

33%

LEVEL 2

53

42%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

82

40%

LEVEL 2

85

41%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

45

28%

LEVEL 2

78

48%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

38

22%

LEVEL 2

85

48%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

39

74%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

40

74%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

16

27%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

28

48%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

68

44%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

70

41%

LEVEL 2

70

41%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

40
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

82

39%

LEVEL 2

88

42%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

94

42%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.