POTSDAM CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

155

39%

LEVEL 3

120

30%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

104

21%

LEVEL 2

187

38%

LEVEL 3

118

24%

LEVEL 4

88

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

53

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

96

21%

LEVEL 2

173

38%

LEVEL 3

112

25%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

170

39%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

27

75%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

40

67%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

100

38%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

54

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

77

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

43

31%

LEVEL 2

55

40%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

74

38%

LEVEL 2

80

41%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.