A A KINGSTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

46

17%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

119

40%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

50

40%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

24

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

73

30%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

101

41%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

19

73%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

46

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

33

38%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

40

38%

LEVEL 2

47

44%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.