OGDENSBURG CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

191

32%

LEVEL 2

218

37%

LEVEL 3

116

19%

LEVEL 4

72

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

205

33%

LEVEL 2

213

34%

LEVEL 3

130

21%

LEVEL 4

74

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

89

30%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

104

34%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

102

34%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

101

32%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

188

32%

LEVEL 2

215

37%

LEVEL 3

114

19%

LEVEL 4

70

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

204

33%

LEVEL 2

209

34%

LEVEL 3

127

21%

LEVEL 4

72

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

102

21%

LEVEL 2

204

42%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

71

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

123

24%

LEVEL 2

193

37%

LEVEL 3

126

24%

LEVEL 4

74

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

89

82%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

82

77%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

46

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

154

42%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

62

17%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

160

42%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

204
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

201

33%

LEVEL 2

211

34%

LEVEL 3

130

21%

LEVEL 4

74

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.