Skip to Content
Main content

CANTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

78

19%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

130

32%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

85

22%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

108

28%

LEVEL 4

78

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

39

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

42

21%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

192
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

73

19%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

128

33%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

178
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

84

23%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

72

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

122

37%

LEVEL 4

65

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

77

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

42

62%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

37

58%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

60

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

54

34%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

186
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

114

30%

LEVEL 3

108

28%

LEVEL 4

78

20%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.