Skip to Content
Main content

RICHARD P CONNOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

63

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

75

49%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

36

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

35

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

33

46%

LEVEL 4

27

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

40

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

12

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

30

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

44

69%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

28

45%

LEVEL 4

15

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

24

43%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

62

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

72

51%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

74

51%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

49

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

60

71%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

29

43%

LEVEL 4

14

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

28

42%

LEVEL 4

15

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.