Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH ORANGETOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

421
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 825

LEVEL 1

139

17%

LEVEL 2

265

32%

LEVEL 3

265

32%

LEVEL 4

156

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

390
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 796

LEVEL 1

134

17%

LEVEL 2

272

34%

LEVEL 3

241

30%

LEVEL 4

149

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

224
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

62

15%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

148

36%

LEVEL 4

76

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

200
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

134

33%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

197
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

141

34%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

80

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

190
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

66

17%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

83

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

31

35%

LEVEL 4

32

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

25

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

294
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

77

14%

LEVEL 2

187

34%

LEVEL 3

187

34%

LEVEL 4

107

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

277
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

76

14%

LEVEL 2

183

34%

LEVEL 3

176

33%

LEVEL 4

101

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

50

39%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

42

33%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

407
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

83

11%

LEVEL 2

238

33%

LEVEL 3

254

35%

LEVEL 4

153

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

383
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

99

14%

LEVEL 2

245

34%

LEVEL 3

238

33%

LEVEL 4

145

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

56

58%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

35

51%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

418
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 800

LEVEL 1

121

15%

LEVEL 2

261

33%

LEVEL 3

264

33%

LEVEL 4

154

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

389
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 770

LEVEL 1

112

15%

LEVEL 2

269

35%

LEVEL 3

240

31%

LEVEL 4

149

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

18

72%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

22

85%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

385
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

94

13%

LEVEL 2

228

32%

LEVEL 3

238

34%

LEVEL 4

147

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

352
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

92

14%

LEVEL 2

230

34%

LEVEL 3

217

32%

LEVEL 4

135

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

45

38%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

42

34%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.