Skip to Content
Main content

HOOSICK FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

85

22%

LEVEL 2

164

43%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

101

27%

LEVEL 2

133

35%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

92

43%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

55

29%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

153

43%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

92

26%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

59

17%

LEVEL 2

154

45%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

123

37%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

26

65%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

30

70%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

89

45%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

54

29%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

66

35%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.