Skip to Content
Main content

RED MILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

68

42%

LEVEL 4

43

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

71

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

33

40%

LEVEL 4

19

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

42

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

35

43%

LEVEL 4

24

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

27

35%

LEVEL 4

29

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

54

43%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

57

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

63

43%

LEVEL 4

41

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

68

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

51

42%

LEVEL 4

38

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

60

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

11

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.