PULASKI CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

130

33%

LEVEL 2

153

39%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

107

27%

LEVEL 2

170

42%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

58

31%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

82

43%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

127

33%

LEVEL 2

150

39%

LEVEL 3

74

19%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

106

27%

LEVEL 2

163

42%

LEVEL 3

82

21%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

90

27%

LEVEL 2

141

42%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

157

46%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

40

69%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

47

76%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

80

41%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

77

37%

LEVEL 2

90

43%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.