MEXICO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

158

29%

LEVEL 2

228

42%

LEVEL 3

121

22%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

138

28%

LEVEL 2

182

37%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

56

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

75

28%

LEVEL 2

122

46%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

95

39%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

69

28%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

151

29%

LEVEL 2

216

41%

LEVEL 3

114

22%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

131

28%

LEVEL 2

173

37%

LEVEL 3

106

23%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

202

46%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

87

21%

LEVEL 2

163

39%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

72

68%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

51

69%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

93

41%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

113

35%

LEVEL 2

135

42%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

105

37%

LEVEL 2

117

41%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.