Skip to Content
Main content

C S DRIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

93

18%

LEVEL 2

141

27%

LEVEL 3

185

36%

LEVEL 4

101

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

320
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

146

29%

LEVEL 3

166

32%

LEVEL 4

154

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

88

38%

LEVEL 4

52

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

71

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

62

22%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

97

34%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

175
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

83

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

277
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

90

18%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

179

36%

LEVEL 4

98

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

308
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

142

29%

LEVEL 3

161

33%

LEVEL 4

147

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

57

12%

LEVEL 2

128

28%

LEVEL 3

181

39%

LEVEL 4

98

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

306
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

135

29%

LEVEL 3

155

33%

LEVEL 4

151

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

36

64%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

263
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

62

14%

LEVEL 2

117

26%

LEVEL 3

166

38%

LEVEL 4

97

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

276
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

116

27%

LEVEL 3

139

33%

LEVEL 4

137

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

31

40%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.