Skip to Content
Main content

WELLWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

299
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

82

19%

LEVEL 3

142

33%

LEVEL 4

157

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

104

24%

LEVEL 3

149

34%

LEVEL 4

142

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

83

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

69

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

74

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

73

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

20

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

17

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

256
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

73

20%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

134

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

252
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

135

36%

LEVEL 4

117

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

75

19%

LEVEL 3

141

36%

LEVEL 4

157

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

92

23%

LEVEL 3

145

37%

LEVEL 4

141

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

26

76%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

19

53%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

71

19%

LEVEL 3

131

35%

LEVEL 4

146

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

267
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

79

21%

LEVEL 3

135

37%

LEVEL 4

132

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.