Skip to Content
Main content

JORDAN-ELBRIDGE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

119

29%

LEVEL 2

150

37%

LEVEL 3

95

23%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

107

27%

LEVEL 2

150

38%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

52

26%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

65

32%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

110

29%

LEVEL 2

140

37%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

99

27%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

88

24%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

144

41%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

31

82%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

33

80%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

65

23%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

54

44%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

51

38%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

136
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

105

27%

LEVEL 2

148

38%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.