Skip to Content
Main content

SHERRILL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

98

22%

LEVEL 2

158

35%

LEVEL 3

141

31%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

90

18%

LEVEL 2

171

34%

LEVEL 3

144

29%

LEVEL 4

97

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

73

30%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

53

20%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

190
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

88

20%

LEVEL 2

153

35%

LEVEL 3

137

32%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

233
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

82

17%

LEVEL 2

161

34%

LEVEL 3

139

29%

LEVEL 4

94

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

151

38%

LEVEL 3

137

34%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

56

13%

LEVEL 2

155

35%

LEVEL 3

141

31%

LEVEL 4

96

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

39

76%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

34

63%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

93

29%

LEVEL 4

81

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.