Skip to Content
Main content

REGAN INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

42

11%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

100

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

101

25%

LEVEL 3

133

33%

LEVEL 4

125

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

57

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

76

38%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

64

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

230
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

134

35%

LEVEL 4

96

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

239
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

124

34%

LEVEL 4

115

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

132

37%

LEVEL 4

100

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

127

35%

LEVEL 4

125

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

14

36%

LEVEL 2

20

51%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

256
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

124

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

89

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

117

35%

LEVEL 4

116

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

28

40%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

17

27%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.