PS 23 RICHMONDTOWN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

71

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

83

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

39

39%

LEVEL 4

32

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

40

37%

LEVEL 4

38

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

39

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

45

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

55

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

74

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

10

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

21

55%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

57

40%

LEVEL 4

62

44%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

76

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

36

47%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

13

19%

LEVEL 2

32

47%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

142
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

68

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

151
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

82

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

52

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

69

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

31

36%

LEVEL 4

19

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

30

45%

LEVEL 4

14

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.