Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #31 - STATEN ISLAND GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,800
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,339

LEVEL 1

7,048

28%

LEVEL 2

8,491

34%

LEVEL 3

5,844

23%

LEVEL 4

3,956

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,011
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,212

LEVEL 1

7,074

28%

LEVEL 2

8,127

32%

LEVEL 3

5,594

22%

LEVEL 4

4,417

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,805
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,303

LEVEL 1

3,238

26%

LEVEL 2

4,260

35%

LEVEL 3

2,850

23%

LEVEL 4

1,955

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,947
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,132

LEVEL 1

3,201

26%

LEVEL 2

3,984

33%

LEVEL 3

2,805

23%

LEVEL 4

2,142

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,995
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,036

LEVEL 1

3,810

29%

LEVEL 2

4,231

32%

LEVEL 3

2,994

23%

LEVEL 4

2,001

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,064
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,080

LEVEL 1

3,873

30%

LEVEL 2

4,143

32%

LEVEL 3

2,789

21%

LEVEL 4

2,275

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

72
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

56

29%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

116
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

36
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

26

27%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

43
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

30

27%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,373
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,029

LEVEL 1

185

9%

LEVEL 2

471

23%

LEVEL 3

618

30%

LEVEL 4

755

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,358
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,003

LEVEL 1

207

10%

LEVEL 2

438

22%

LEVEL 3

579

29%

LEVEL 4

779

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,170
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,902

LEVEL 1

2,306

18%

LEVEL 2

4,426

34%

LEVEL 3

3,623

28%

LEVEL 4

2,547

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,308
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,554

LEVEL 1

2,177

17%

LEVEL 2

4,069

32%

LEVEL 3

3,446

27%

LEVEL 4

2,862

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

538
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,315

LEVEL 1

1,709

52%

LEVEL 2

1,068

32%

LEVEL 3

409

12%

LEVEL 4

129

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

512
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,276

LEVEL 1

1,751

53%

LEVEL 2

1,013

31%

LEVEL 3

368

11%

LEVEL 4

144

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,611
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,801

LEVEL 1

2,766

41%

LEVEL 2

2,424

36%

LEVEL 3

1,133

17%

LEVEL 4

478

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,674
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,009

LEVEL 1

2,841

41%

LEVEL 2

2,494

36%

LEVEL 3

1,117

16%

LEVEL 4

557

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,964
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,414

LEVEL 1

2,987

16%

LEVEL 2

6,463

35%

LEVEL 3

5,204

28%

LEVEL 4

3,760

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,163
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,246

LEVEL 1

3,062

17%

LEVEL 2

6,021

33%

LEVEL 3

4,961

27%

LEVEL 4

4,202

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

836
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,925

LEVEL 1

4,061

59%

LEVEL 2

2,028

29%

LEVEL 3

640

9%

LEVEL 4

196

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

848
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,966

LEVEL 1

4,012

58%

LEVEL 2

2,106

30%

LEVEL 3

633

9%

LEVEL 4

215

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9,651
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,969

LEVEL 1

6,179

26%

LEVEL 2

8,139

34%

LEVEL 3

5,729

24%

LEVEL 4

3,922

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9,878
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,855

LEVEL 1

6,225

26%

LEVEL 2

7,752

32%

LEVEL 3

5,496

23%

LEVEL 4

4,382

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,370

LEVEL 1

869

63%

LEVEL 2

352

26%

LEVEL 3

115

8%

LEVEL 4

34

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

133
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,357

LEVEL 1

849

63%

LEVEL 2

375

28%

LEVEL 3

98

7%

LEVEL 4

35

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,618
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,788

LEVEL 1

1,691

16%

LEVEL 2

3,479

32%

LEVEL 3

3,045

28%

LEVEL 4

2,573

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,910
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,850

LEVEL 1

1,676

15%

LEVEL 2

3,264

30%

LEVEL 3

3,027

28%

LEVEL 4

2,883

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,182
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,551

LEVEL 1

5,357

37%

LEVEL 2

5,012

34%

LEVEL 3

2,799

19%

LEVEL 4

1,383

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,362

LEVEL 1

5,398

38%

LEVEL 2

4,863

34%

LEVEL 3

2,567

18%

LEVEL 4

1,534

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.