Skip to Content
Main content

PS 117 J KELD/BRIARWOOD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

98

21%

LEVEL 2

152

33%

LEVEL 3

135

29%

LEVEL 4

77

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

101

22%

LEVEL 2

147

32%

LEVEL 3

126

27%

LEVEL 4

92

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

50

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

50

21%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

101
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

115
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

51

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

14

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

47

33%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

66

17%

LEVEL 2

126

33%

LEVEL 3

119

31%

LEVEL 4

75

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

32

42%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

43

48%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

204
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

131

33%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

75

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

213
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

131

31%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

91

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

36

55%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

27

56%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

80

33%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

63

27%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.