Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 194 WILLIAM CARR GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

524
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,020

LEVEL 1

196

19%

LEVEL 2

300

29%

LEVEL 3

236

23%

LEVEL 4

288

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

571
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,061

LEVEL 1

168

16%

LEVEL 2

322

30%

LEVEL 3

236

22%

LEVEL 4

335

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

266
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

93

18%

LEVEL 2

156

30%

LEVEL 3

113

22%

LEVEL 4

153

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

277
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

155

31%

LEVEL 3

114

23%

LEVEL 4

163

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

258
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

103

20%

LEVEL 2

144

29%

LEVEL 3

123

24%

LEVEL 4

135

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

294
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

100

18%

LEVEL 2

167

30%

LEVEL 3

122

22%

LEVEL 4

172

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

273
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

63

18%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

176

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

311
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

60

15%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

215

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

67

20%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

68

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

78

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

88

28%

LEVEL 2

134

43%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

500
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 851

LEVEL 1

94

11%

LEVEL 2

257

30%

LEVEL 3

217

25%

LEVEL 4

283

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

550
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 885

LEVEL 1

75

8%

LEVEL 2

260

29%

LEVEL 3

222

25%

LEVEL 4

328

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

102

60%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

93

53%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

495
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 946

LEVEL 1

173

18%

LEVEL 2

278

29%

LEVEL 3

216

23%

LEVEL 4

279

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

548
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 983

LEVEL 1

136

14%

LEVEL 2

299

30%

LEVEL 3

222

23%

LEVEL 4

326

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

29
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

23

31%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

32

41%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

116

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

260
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

150

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

316
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

137

21%

LEVEL 2

199

31%

LEVEL 3

144

22%

LEVEL 4

172

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

311
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

104

17%

LEVEL 2

184

31%

LEVEL 3

126

21%

LEVEL 4

185

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.