Skip to Content
Main content

PS 206 JOSEPH F LAMB GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

476
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

84

11%

LEVEL 2

222

28%

LEVEL 3

239

31%

LEVEL 4

237

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

476
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 832

LEVEL 1

124

15%

LEVEL 2

232

28%

LEVEL 3

215

26%

LEVEL 4

261

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

235
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

127

36%

LEVEL 4

108

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

232
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

128

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

241
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

129

30%

LEVEL 3

112

26%

LEVEL 4

129

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

244
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

126

29%

LEVEL 3

111

25%

LEVEL 4

133

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

266
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

145

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

279
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

81

20%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

177

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

86

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

76

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

11

61%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

28

43%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

32

46%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

452
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

41

6%

LEVEL 2

182

27%

LEVEL 3

219

32%

LEVEL 4

233

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

449
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

82

11%

LEVEL 2

191

26%

LEVEL 3

199

28%

LEVEL 4

250

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

43

40%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

42

38%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

445
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 680

LEVEL 1

46

7%

LEVEL 2

189

28%

LEVEL 3

214

31%

LEVEL 4

231

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

439
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

77

11%

LEVEL 2

192

27%

LEVEL 3

187

26%

LEVEL 4

252

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

38

37%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

47

38%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

68

37%

LEVEL 4

79

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

84

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

329
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

80

13%

LEVEL 2

187

31%

LEVEL 3

171

29%

LEVEL 4

158

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

315
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

116

19%

LEVEL 2

190

31%

LEVEL 3

138

22%

LEVEL 4

177

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.