Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #22 - BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,955
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,905

LEVEL 1

4,145

28%

LEVEL 2

4,805

32%

LEVEL 3

3,322

22%

LEVEL 4

2,633

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,051
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,664

LEVEL 1

3,981

27%

LEVEL 2

4,632

32%

LEVEL 3

3,141

21%

LEVEL 4

2,910

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,965
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,206

LEVEL 1

1,890

26%

LEVEL 2

2,351

33%

LEVEL 3

1,707

24%

LEVEL 4

1,258

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,009
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,090

LEVEL 1

1,808

26%

LEVEL 2

2,273

32%

LEVEL 3

1,591

22%

LEVEL 4

1,418

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,990
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,699

LEVEL 1

2,255

29%

LEVEL 2

2,454

32%

LEVEL 3

1,615

21%

LEVEL 4

1,375

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,042
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,574

LEVEL 1

2,173

29%

LEVEL 2

2,359

31%

LEVEL 3

1,550

20%

LEVEL 4

1,492

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

37
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

16

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

57
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

34

31%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

30
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

20

23%

LEVEL 2

36

42%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

39
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,482
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,409

LEVEL 1

317

13%

LEVEL 2

610

25%

LEVEL 3

656

27%

LEVEL 4

826

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,521
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,454

LEVEL 1

331

13%

LEVEL 2

602

25%

LEVEL 3

627

26%

LEVEL 4

894

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,383
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,087

LEVEL 1

531

13%

LEVEL 2

1,173

29%

LEVEL 3

1,205

29%

LEVEL 4

1,178

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,448
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,160

LEVEL 1

625

15%

LEVEL 2

1,087

26%

LEVEL 3

1,125

27%

LEVEL 4

1,323

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,375
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,083

LEVEL 1

2,524

41%

LEVEL 2

2,184

36%

LEVEL 3

981

16%

LEVEL 4

394

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,345
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,648

LEVEL 1

2,255

40%

LEVEL 2

2,048

36%

LEVEL 3

929

16%

LEVEL 4

416

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

648
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,161

LEVEL 1

736

34%

LEVEL 2

777

36%

LEVEL 3

443

20%

LEVEL 4

205

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

641
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,186

LEVEL 1

724

33%

LEVEL 2

821

38%

LEVEL 3

412

19%

LEVEL 4

229

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,551
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,847

LEVEL 1

2,323

20%

LEVEL 2

3,973

34%

LEVEL 3

3,034

26%

LEVEL 4

2,517

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,627
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,573

LEVEL 1

2,259

20%

LEVEL 2

3,687

32%

LEVEL 3

2,843

25%

LEVEL 4

2,784

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

404
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,058

LEVEL 1

1,822

60%

LEVEL 2

832

27%

LEVEL 3

288

9%

LEVEL 4

116

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

424
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,091

LEVEL 1

1,722

56%

LEVEL 2

945

31%

LEVEL 3

298

10%

LEVEL 4

126

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,696
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,416

LEVEL 1

3,350

25%

LEVEL 2

4,370

33%

LEVEL 3

3,148

23%

LEVEL 4

2,548

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,836
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,182

LEVEL 1

3,190

24%

LEVEL 2

4,156

32%

LEVEL 3

2,987

23%

LEVEL 4

2,849

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

259
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,489

LEVEL 1

795

53%

LEVEL 2

435

29%

LEVEL 3

174

12%

LEVEL 4

85

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

215
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,482

LEVEL 1

791

53%

LEVEL 2

476

32%

LEVEL 3

154

10%

LEVEL 4

61

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,429
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,698

LEVEL 1

917

20%

LEVEL 2

1,352

29%

LEVEL 3

1,226

26%

LEVEL 4

1,203

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,504
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,594

LEVEL 1

850

19%

LEVEL 2

1,240

27%

LEVEL 3

1,167

25%

LEVEL 4

1,337

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,526
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,207

LEVEL 1

3,228

32%

LEVEL 2

3,453

34%

LEVEL 3

2,096

21%

LEVEL 4

1,430

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,547
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,070

LEVEL 1

3,131

31%

LEVEL 2

3,392

34%

LEVEL 3

1,974

20%

LEVEL 4

1,573

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.