Skip to Content
Main content

IS 303 HERBERT S EISENBERG GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

144

31%

LEVEL 2

165

36%

LEVEL 3

104

23%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

138

32%

LEVEL 2

187

43%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

97

42%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

90

44%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

33

38%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

41

45%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

59

41%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

61

45%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

63

40%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

65

44%

LEVEL 2

62

42%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

93

25%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

87

24%

LEVEL 2

163

46%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

51

57%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

51

65%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

126
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

120

31%

LEVEL 2

145

37%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

116

31%

LEVEL 2

165

44%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

24

36%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

22

35%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

37

23%

LEVEL 2

76

48%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

97

32%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

101

36%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.