Skip to Content
Main content

PS 127 MCKINLEY PARK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

67

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

24

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

27

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

37

29%

LEVEL 4

28

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

40

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

15

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

20

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

35

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

41

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

22

38%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

15

26%

LEVEL 2

25

44%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

65

33%

LEVEL 4

51

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

61

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

24

45%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

26

48%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

51

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

127
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

63

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

19

45%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

15

39%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

24

38%

LEVEL 4

18

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

17

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.