Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #15 - BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,666
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,520

LEVEL 1

2,653

23%

LEVEL 2

3,201

28%

LEVEL 3

2,956

26%

LEVEL 4

2,710

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,073
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,829

LEVEL 1

2,628

22%

LEVEL 2

3,128

26%

LEVEL 3

2,729

23%

LEVEL 4

3,344

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,852
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,711

LEVEL 1

1,240

22%

LEVEL 2

1,619

28%

LEVEL 3

1,531

27%

LEVEL 4

1,321

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,052
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,864

LEVEL 1

1,229

21%

LEVEL 2

1,583

27%

LEVEL 3

1,393

24%

LEVEL 4

1,659

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,814
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,809

LEVEL 1

1,413

24%

LEVEL 2

1,582

27%

LEVEL 3

1,425

25%

LEVEL 4

1,389

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,021
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,965

LEVEL 1

1,399

23%

LEVEL 2

1,545

26%

LEVEL 3

1,336

22%

LEVEL 4

1,685

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

123
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

77

48%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

167
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

108

52%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,436
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,162

LEVEL 1

263

12%

LEVEL 2

463

21%

LEVEL 3

646

30%

LEVEL 4

790

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,563
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,315

LEVEL 1

245

11%

LEVEL 2

507

22%

LEVEL 3

627

27%

LEVEL 4

936

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,288
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,131

LEVEL 1

261

8%

LEVEL 2

582

19%

LEVEL 3

1,044

33%

LEVEL 4

1,244

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,506
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,348

LEVEL 1

279

8%

LEVEL 2

563

17%

LEVEL 3

930

28%

LEVEL 4

1,576

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

320
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,016

LEVEL 1

329

32%

LEVEL 2

367

36%

LEVEL 3

212

21%

LEVEL 4

108

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

331
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 922

LEVEL 1

304

33%

LEVEL 2

287

31%

LEVEL 3

206

22%

LEVEL 4

125

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,493
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,023

LEVEL 1

1,783

35%

LEVEL 2

1,747

35%

LEVEL 3

1,003

20%

LEVEL 4

490

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,499
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,006

LEVEL 1

1,775

35%

LEVEL 2

1,732

35%

LEVEL 3

904

18%

LEVEL 4

595

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,174
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,084

LEVEL 1

1,397

15%

LEVEL 2

2,513

28%

LEVEL 3

2,634

29%

LEVEL 4

2,540

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,598
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,378

LEVEL 1

1,332

14%

LEVEL 2

2,448

26%

LEVEL 3

2,460

26%

LEVEL 4

3,138

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

492
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,436

LEVEL 1

1,256

52%

LEVEL 2

688

28%

LEVEL 3

322

13%

LEVEL 4

170

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

475
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,451

LEVEL 1

1,296

53%

LEVEL 2

680

28%

LEVEL 3

269

11%

LEVEL 4

206

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,156
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,495

LEVEL 1

1,702

18%

LEVEL 2

2,637

28%

LEVEL 3

2,634

28%

LEVEL 4

2,522

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,623
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,809

LEVEL 1

1,677

17%

LEVEL 2

2,509

26%

LEVEL 3

2,459

25%

LEVEL 4

3,164

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

510
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,025

LEVEL 1

951

47%

LEVEL 2

564

28%

LEVEL 3

322

16%

LEVEL 4

188

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

450
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,020

LEVEL 1

951

47%

LEVEL 2

619

31%

LEVEL 3

270

13%

LEVEL 4

180

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,271
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,838

LEVEL 1

517

11%

LEVEL 2

1,050

22%

LEVEL 3

1,535

32%

LEVEL 4

1,736

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,613
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,217

LEVEL 1

573

11%

LEVEL 2

1,031

20%

LEVEL 3

1,401

27%

LEVEL 4

2,212

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,395
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,682

LEVEL 1

2,136

32%

LEVEL 2

2,151

32%

LEVEL 3

1,421

21%

LEVEL 4

974

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,460
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,612

LEVEL 1

2,055

31%

LEVEL 2

2,097

32%

LEVEL 3

1,328

20%

LEVEL 4

1,132

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.