Skip to Content
Main content

PS 211 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

181

50%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

167

46%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

45

13%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

88

47%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

75

41%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

93

53%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

92

51%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

153

48%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

139

44%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

131

43%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

125

41%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

50

82%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

42

72%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

87

37%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

79

61%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

80

64%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

175

51%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

157

46%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.