Skip to Content
Main content

MS 390 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

222

61%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

218

52%

LEVEL 2

166

39%

LEVEL 3

32

8%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

105

59%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

96

50%

LEVEL 2

84

44%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

117

62%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

122

53%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

36

59%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

30

54%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

183

61%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

186

52%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

25

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

166

56%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

163

48%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

56

80%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

55

65%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

33
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

137

51%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

37
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

132

43%

LEVEL 2

141

45%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

85

87%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

86

77%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

24

63%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

200

62%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

194

51%

LEVEL 2

154

40%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.