Skip to Content
Main content

PS 226 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

108

46%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

103

44%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

61

52%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

47

43%

LEVEL 2

49

45%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

47

40%

LEVEL 2

48

41%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

56

46%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

88

51%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

80

49%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

89

46%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

74

40%

LEVEL 2

76

41%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

19

45%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

29

63%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

58

33%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

56

32%

LEVEL 2

79

45%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

50

82%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

47

84%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

105

47%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

101

45%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.