Skip to Content
Main content

PS 32 BELMONT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

161

41%

LEVEL 2

144

37%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

120

31%

LEVEL 2

166

42%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

79

38%

LEVEL 2

80

39%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

105

48%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

82

45%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

38

43%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

34

33%

LEVEL 2

41

40%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

121

41%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

82

29%

LEVEL 2

119

43%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

105

36%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

85

30%

LEVEL 2

125

44%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

56

55%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

35

32%

LEVEL 2

41

38%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

129

39%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

97
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

91

27%

LEVEL 2

146

44%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

32

55%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

29

49%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

157

41%

LEVEL 2

142

37%

LEVEL 3

70

18%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.