PS 55 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

193

56%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

198

61%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

37

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

94

53%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

87

59%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

99

58%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

111

62%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

101

56%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

93

56%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

129

48%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

136

54%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

64

82%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

62

86%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

37
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

152

51%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

165

57%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

41

82%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

33

85%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

181

55%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

182

60%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.