Skip to Content
Main content

PS 130 ABRAM STEVENS HEWITT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

110

51%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

95

41%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

53

51%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

45

47%

LEVEL 2

38

40%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

57

50%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

50

37%

LEVEL 2

53

39%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

25

43%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

23

39%

LEVEL 2

23

39%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

82

55%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

70

43%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

69

42%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

83

47%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

41

82%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

43

80%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

76

46%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

34

67%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

32

60%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

23

55%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

23

40%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

87

50%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

72

42%

LEVEL 2

70

40%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.