Skip to Content
Main content

PS 6 LILLIE D BLAKE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

46

14%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

189

57%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

44

12%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

208

59%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

84

52%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

93

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

105

61%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

20

11%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

115

61%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

26

72%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

33

77%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

213
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

138

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

35

13%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

153

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

14

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

13

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

25

9%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

171

62%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

7%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

187

67%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

18

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

43
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

22

30%

LEVEL 4

21

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

281
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

45

14%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

185

56%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

272
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

42

13%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

182

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

283
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

39

12%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

197

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

11

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.