Skip to Content
Main content

PS 11 SARAH J GARNETT ES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

76

20%

LEVEL 3

102

27%

LEVEL 4

148

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

46

10%

LEVEL 2

106

24%

LEVEL 3

104

23%

LEVEL 4

194

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

43

26%

LEVEL 4

62

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

94

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

86

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

100

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

32

63%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

61
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

48

74%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

93

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

110

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

19

45%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

52

45%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

26

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

57

18%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

142

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

79

21%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

189

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

26

43%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

22

33%

LEVEL 2

27

41%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

248
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

72

20%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

147

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

292
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

100

23%

LEVEL 3

102

23%

LEVEL 4

190

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

38

16%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

128

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

252
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

172

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

37

27%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.