Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH MERRICK UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

69

22%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

120

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

83

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

65

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

43

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

49

35%

LEVEL 4

55

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

40

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

14

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

46

20%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

91

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

64

36%

LEVEL 4

61

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

11

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

9

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

53

19%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

119

42%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

50

21%

LEVEL 3

88

38%

LEVEL 4

83

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

114

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

81

37%

LEVEL 4

78

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.