Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN LEWIS CHILDS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

86

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

102

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

34

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

57

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

68

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

19

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

23

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

65

35%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

71

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

85

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

100

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

87

35%

LEVEL 4

83

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

93

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

17

25%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.