GARDEN CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

120

34%

LEVEL 4

140

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

66

17%

LEVEL 3

137

34%

LEVEL 4

185

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

61

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

92

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

79

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

93

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

12

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

20

77%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

76

24%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

119

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

281
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

126

36%

LEVEL 4

155

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

8

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

62

19%

LEVEL 3

116

36%

LEVEL 4

139

43%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

316
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

56

15%

LEVEL 3

132

35%

LEVEL 4

184

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

22

67%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

258
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

140

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

318
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

59

15%

LEVEL 3

136

35%

LEVEL 4

182

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

75%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.