Skip to Content
Main content

WILLINK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

84

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

122

33%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

82

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

46

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

60

36%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

45

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

76

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

102

32%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

74

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

84

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

116

35%

LEVEL 4

82

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

17

49%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

79

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

70

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

19

34%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

17

32%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

12

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.