HOLLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

62

25%

LEVEL 2

102

40%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

78

28%

LEVEL 2

103

36%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

60

43%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

31

27%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

39

32%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

60

25%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

53

22%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

25

66%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

44

41%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

48

33%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.