ATTICA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

122

25%

LEVEL 2

203

41%

LEVEL 3

116

24%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

107

23%

LEVEL 2

202

43%

LEVEL 3

89

19%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

55

22%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

104

42%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

103

46%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

110

24%

LEVEL 2

196

42%

LEVEL 3

111

24%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

100

22%

LEVEL 2

194

43%

LEVEL 3

84

19%

LEVEL 4

69

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

183

44%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

176

45%

LEVEL 3

87

22%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

46

64%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

46

60%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

119

40%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

119

41%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

53

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

69

36%

LEVEL 2

84

44%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

59

33%

LEVEL 2

83

46%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.