ATTICA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

24

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

46

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

30

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

13

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

16

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

44

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

42

37%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

46

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

31

45%

LEVEL 4

19

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

31

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

15

28%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

27

42%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

15

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.