Skip to Content
Main content

LETCHWORTH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

119

34%

LEVEL 3

106

30%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

78

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

41

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

76

41%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

77

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

105

34%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

78

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

33

77%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

56

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

32

25%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

67

43%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.