Skip to Content
Main content

ONEIDA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

83

30%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

35

27%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

48

32%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

36

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

75

32%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

72

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

43

81%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

50

78%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

25

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

51

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

62

39%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.