Skip to Content
Main content

CAZENOVIA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

181

35%

LEVEL 4

115

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

134

30%

LEVEL 4

133

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

75

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

92

35%

LEVEL 4

59

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

63

31%

LEVEL 4

58

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

279
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

38

8%

LEVEL 2

160

34%

LEVEL 3

172

36%

LEVEL 4

107

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

254
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

125

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

155

33%

LEVEL 3

174

38%

LEVEL 4

115

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

132

33%

LEVEL 4

133

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

19

51%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

255
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

126

32%

LEVEL 3

152

38%

LEVEL 4

103

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

115

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

28

24%

LEVEL 2

48

41%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.