Skip to Content
Main content

LOWVILLE ACADEMY & CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

123

23%

LEVEL 2

211

39%

LEVEL 3

135

25%

LEVEL 4

67

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

118

22%

LEVEL 2

216

40%

LEVEL 3

117

21%

LEVEL 4

94

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

51

20%

LEVEL 2

98

39%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

67

23%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

117

23%

LEVEL 2

196

38%

LEVEL 3

132

26%

LEVEL 4

67

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

112

22%

LEVEL 2

197

39%

LEVEL 3

114

22%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

195

41%

LEVEL 3

129

27%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

75

15%

LEVEL 2

205

42%

LEVEL 3

114

23%

LEVEL 4

92

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

40

62%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

43

73%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

93

33%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

72

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

87

34%

LEVEL 2

109

43%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

116

46%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.