Skip to Content
Main content

INDIAN RIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

148

32%

LEVEL 2

193

41%

LEVEL 3

99

21%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

131

28%

LEVEL 2

206

44%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

75

33%

LEVEL 2

94

42%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

69

30%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

73

30%

LEVEL 2

99

41%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

116

49%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

72

24%

LEVEL 2

144

48%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

26

40%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

28

45%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

25

36%

LEVEL 2

34

49%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

20

34%

LEVEL 2

27

46%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

97

25%

LEVEL 2

176

45%

LEVEL 3

96

24%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

93

23%

LEVEL 2

176

44%

LEVEL 3

86

22%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

51

72%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

38

52%

LEVEL 2

30

41%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

122
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

140

31%

LEVEL 2

189

42%

LEVEL 3

99

22%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

131
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

122

27%

LEVEL 2

205

45%

LEVEL 3

91

20%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

62

27%

LEVEL 2

93

40%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

111

44%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

86

37%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

95

44%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.