Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH JEFFERSON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

154

24%

LEVEL 2

233

37%

LEVEL 3

182

29%

LEVEL 4

66

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 684

LEVEL 1

176

26%

LEVEL 2

266

39%

LEVEL 3

155

23%

LEVEL 4

87

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

78

24%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

143

41%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

76

24%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

93

28%

LEVEL 2

123

37%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

238
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

144

24%

LEVEL 2

225

37%

LEVEL 3

173

29%

LEVEL 4

65

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

237
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

165

25%

LEVEL 2

253

39%

LEVEL 3

152

23%

LEVEL 4

85

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

211

40%

LEVEL 3

176

34%

LEVEL 4

63

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

94

17%

LEVEL 2

231

41%

LEVEL 3

149

27%

LEVEL 4

85

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

79

72%

LEVEL 2

22

20%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

82

66%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

115

34%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

66

19%

LEVEL 2

119

35%

LEVEL 3

104

30%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

97

33%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

110

32%

LEVEL 2

147

43%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.