Skip to Content
Main content

CAIRO-DURHAM CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

135

45%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

148

45%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

58

39%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

65

40%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

77

50%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

83

50%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

112

43%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

122

44%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

93

37%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

115

41%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

42

86%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

33

72%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

41

32%

LEVEL 2

49

38%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

48

35%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

94

54%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

100

53%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.