Skip to Content
Main content

BROADALBIN-PERTH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

115

22%

LEVEL 2

183

36%

LEVEL 3

129

25%

LEVEL 4

87

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

131

24%

LEVEL 2

201

36%

LEVEL 3

132

24%

LEVEL 4

88

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

63

24%

LEVEL 2

102

39%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

68

24%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

110

23%

LEVEL 2

172

35%

LEVEL 3

122

25%

LEVEL 4

84

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

127

24%

LEVEL 2

190

36%

LEVEL 3

124

24%

LEVEL 4

85

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

78

17%

LEVEL 2

168

37%

LEVEL 3

125

27%

LEVEL 4

87

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

90

18%

LEVEL 2

186

38%

LEVEL 3

129

26%

LEVEL 4

87

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

37

66%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

41

68%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

72

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

86

37%

LEVEL 2

89

38%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.