MAYFIELD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

74

24%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

38

23%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

41

32%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

62

27%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

83

30%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

25

69%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

24

65%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

36

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

38

37%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

46

30%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.