SALMON RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

176

40%

LEVEL 2

171

39%

LEVEL 3

78

18%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

234

46%

LEVEL 2

177

35%

LEVEL 3

72

14%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

82

41%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

107

44%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

132

48%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

31

11%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

109

41%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

59
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

151

47%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

65

38%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

78

44%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

113

30%

LEVEL 2

166

45%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

170

39%

LEVEL 2

172

39%

LEVEL 3

70

16%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

63

89%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

64

90%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

13

17%

LEVEL 2

33

43%

LEVEL 3

23

30%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

30

29%

LEVEL 2

47

45%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

163

44%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

204

51%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

96
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

166

39%

LEVEL 2

168

39%

LEVEL 3

77

18%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

95
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

221

45%

LEVEL 2

175

36%

LEVEL 3

71

14%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

13

81%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.